Are 2km CSG buffer zones in NSW practical and workable? > Check the facts

Are 2km CSG buffer zones in NSW practical and workable? > Check the facts

Who: “the bottom line is … it needs to be a buffer from major urban population centers not from hamlets, and the gas companies are saying the system in NSW right now is simply not practical or workable”. Federal Resources Minister Ian Macfarlane

The claim: The buffer zone in NSW is now not practical or workable. The buffer zone should only be around major urban populations and not smaller groups of households.

The facts: In 2013 the NSW government announced that it would be introducing regulations that created a two kilometre exclusion zone for CSG wells around residential areas and critical industry clusters for the equine and viticulture industries.

In 2011 the Victorian government introduced changes to the states planning laws that allowed a house owner within two kilometres of a proposed wind turbine to veto the project.

The finding: The restrictions on wind turbines within two kilometres of any house show that a state government can use its planning laws to create buffer zones for energy projects around homes. The NSW government’s two kilometre buffer zone is therefore practical and workable.

Discussion of evidence: The buffer zones introduced by the Victorian government show a state government can use their planning laws to restrict certain projects. The experience in Victoria was the buffer zones severely restricted the industry’s ability to construct new wind turbines. It is possible that a buffer zone around residential areas (not houses) could also restrict the gas industry’s ability to expand its CSG operations.

It is also interesting to note that on the 27th April 2013, Mr Macfarlane spoke at a rally at Cecil Plains in Queensland in which he said;

“I was the one who drove the issue in New South Wales where the resource companies were told they couldn’t drill within two kilometres of houses.” Ian Macfarlane

Before the election Mr Macfarlane not only agreed with the exclusion zone he claimed to have been behind the idea. He also believed the exclusion zone should be around all houses. After the election he is now critical of the exclusion zone and seems to agree with the gas industry that they are not practical or workable and that the zones should be limited to major urban populations.

Share Button